Talk:Chemin de fer de la Baie de Somme

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template[edit]

I've created a template showing the line as it is now, and which parts are which gauge. I'm not sure if it would be worth Also showing the former WWI Ligne des 100 Jours, WWII metre gauge line from Lanchères-Pendé to Ault, and the metre gauge line to Crécy (closed). Mjroots (talk) 15:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To do[edit]

Sections on opening and closing both need rewriting. First line to SVSS opened in 1858, SNCF worked Std gauge line to SVSS until 1989. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjroots (talkcontribs) 17:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)  Done Mjroots (talk) 11:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expand rolling stock section - Locomotives, Passenger and Freight stock. Describe original SE/CFBS stock first, then other preserved stock brought in from elsewhere. Mjroots (talk) 11:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)  Done Mjroots (talk) 16:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add photos of all stations and all locomotives, and a selection of rolling stock. Mjroots (talk) 22:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Refs needed?[edit]

The reference for the info I'm adding is aleady quoted at the bottom of the article. Once i work out how to link the two I will do so. Mjroots (talk) 09:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Done I'm going to remove the refs needed tag as it is all red'd now.Mjroots (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

I've added two images from the French articles. They need captions adding but I don't know how to do it. Mjroots (talk) 11:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)  Done Mjroots (talk) 22:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject France Assessment[edit]

WikiProject France Assessment

This article was listed on WikiProject France under articles needing assessment. This article has been rated B-class because:

  • It has some great info/history/description of the railway as well appropriate photographs.
  • It does have references, however one of them doesn't link anywhere. Done Also, the article does need more sources considering its length.
  • Please expand the lead paragraph. An article of this size requires a good introduction to grab the reader's attention. See WP:Lead.

Lazulilasher (talk) 18:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the ref for the Y2100 class loco by making it into an interwiki link instead. Have expanded the intro a bit, but it probably still needs further expansion. Mjroots (talk) 17:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

network map[edit]

Are there any plans for a network map? The diagram isn't great at showing the network and is confusing at best. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 00:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Network Map[edit]

I know there is a full map of the network including the line from Dompierre to Abbeville and the line from Noyelles to Forest L'Abbaye on the page Réseau des Bains de Mer , but I don't know how to copy it. Could anyone who knows how to do it do it?

86.174.76.50 (talk) 11:04, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The leaving off of the full network in this article is deliberate. Mjroots (talk) 23:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My edits[edit]

The edits I have just made have been translated and added from the French wikipedia page.

109.158.234.16 (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Street view[edit]

The ACf10302 car and the Le Crotoy station can be visited by Google Street view. Hektor (talk) 08:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chemin de fer de la Baie de Somme/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Wikiproject France Assessment ==

WikiProject France Assessment

This article was listed on WikiProject France under articles needing assessment. This article has been rated B-class because:

  • It has some great info/history/description of the railway as well appropriate photographs.
  • It does have references, however one of them doesn't link anywhere. Also, the article does need more sources considering its length.
  • Please expand the lead paragraph. An article of this size requires a good introduction to grab the reader's attention. See WP:Lead.
Lazulilasher (talk) 18:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 11:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemin de Fer de la Baie de Somme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chemin de Fer de la Baie de Somme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]