Talk:Chemical safety

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Crweidman. Peer reviewers: Brynneparkman, Kalewis6.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 27 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Maskewmo. Peer reviewers: MaryGrace J. Larsen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

oppose merge the general topic chemical safety includes but is not limited to Occupational safety and health. see also 2015 Gold King Mine waste water spill, 2014 Elk River chemical spill, Flint water crisis, Lead contamination in Washington, D.C. drinking water, et cetera et cetera. Brock-brac (talk) 20:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Article didn't meet expansion requirements, nominator did not respond to pings.

  • Reviewed: :*

5x expanded by Velella (talk). Self-nominated at 23:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Neither aluminium dross recycling nor dangerous goods are eligible for DYK, as neither have been recently created, expanded or promoted to GA. The title of the page leads me to assume you meant to nominate chemical safety. That article has been recently expanded from 416 to 1617 words (3.89x) which doesn't quite meet the 5x expansion criteria. I recommend either completing the 5x expansion within the next 2 days to meet that criteria, or nominating the article for GA (with no time limit) and renominating it for DYK after it is promoted to GA. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Velella, unfortunately the rule for DYK is Fivefold expansion is calculated from the previously existing article, no matter how bad it was (copyvios are an exception), no matter whether you kept any of it and no matter if it were up for deletion. The article started at 2726 prose characters prior to your expansion work, and needed to achieve 13630 prose characters; it is currently at 10710 prose characters, so another 2920 prose characters are needed. Do you think it will be possible to add that much in the next seven days or so? Please let us know. Thanks, and best of luck. Please note: your hook needs to be about the actual article, in this case Chemical safety, and include a bold link to that article. I have struck the prior hooks, which should not have a space before the closing question mark. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator has been unable to respond to comments and has not edited the article in over 10 days. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 26 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ZZZXS (article contribs). Peer reviewers: XXryoul.

— Assignment last updated by RS UBC800 (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

something needs to improve[edit]

1. This article’s citation is good, but change some citations to the formal article instead of the journal. 2. Add more examples when we talk about an effect on the people or environment. 3. Add the chemical formula when mention a chemical compound react with the other one. 4. Add more photos when do the explanations. 5. Talk about more on the regulations on different countries. 6. mentions the difference between the advanced country and the low-income country. ZZZXS (talk) 00:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]