Talk:Central National Committee (Chetniks)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 24 September 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 13:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Central National Committee of the Kingdom of YugoslaviaCentral National Committee (Chetniks) – this is not the common name in reliable sources in English. The current title is used in only three sources, [1], only one of which is independent of the subject (Lees) and the proposed name, or a close match to it (allowing for our disambiguation policies), has about 250 hits [2], including books by academic experts on the Chetniks, such as Tomasevich, Hoare, Ramet, and Milazzo, all of whom use "Central National Committee" combined with the word Chetnik or Chetniks. The current name also appears (from the placing of it in quotation marks by Lees) to have been effectively a propaganda name used by the committee after Mihailović was removed from the Yugoslav government-in-exile, and is therefore quite imprecise and misleading, implying that it was some sort of ruling body over Yugoslavia, when it clearly was merely a Chetnik organ throughout its existence. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - There is no WP:COMMONNAME, which is precisely why we have the current official title. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Rationale given by nom persuades me. Ramet, Tomasevich, Hoare and other established academics on matters of WWII Yugoslavia use the word "Chetnik" when referring the this organization. It is the common name in English, and as such it better suits the article than the current name does. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.