Talk:Centauro event
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
[edit]
Why would these experiments verify the existence of hidden dimensions? This seems like rather a strong assertion, not to have any support. Joshuardavis 16:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
I also was puzzled by the unsupported statement, and refered to the linked New Scientist article. I found many passages to be slight paraphrasings of the article (or vice-versa?), if not outright copies. While I won't make any ethical judgements on using a source like that, but NS seems to have lower standards of reference than Wikipedia. The hidden dimensions mention may not stir anyone in a news blurb, but when it is copied and unexplained, it tarnishes Wikipedia.
"Exploding holes" vs "Solution to the Centauro puzzle"[edit]
If the solution has indeed been found, please fix the previous incorrect statement. 18:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.30.120 (talk)