Talk:Castelo de Vide

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

cause I don't know, Kezz

why is there no castle in Castelo de Vide? i had a class asignment and i could not do it because I could not find anything about the castle Castelo de Vide!! I went to google and typed in as much stuff as I could and I couldn't find it. All I could find was that it was built the year of 1299. aahhhhhhhh!!!!!!!! So I would appreciate if you would try to make another page about the castle in Castelo de Vide. 
                                                   
                                                         Thanks, Kezz

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Castelo de Vide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023043630/http://www.brunotereso.net/blog/?page_id=199 to http://www.brunotereso.net/blog/?page_id=199&file=Trips%2FPortugal%2FCasteloVide%2F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Fort São Roque into Castelo de Vide[edit]

Provided sources, as well as what I was able to find on Google Scholar, only cover Fort Sao Roque in the broader context of the landmarks of Castelo de Vide, suggesting that it should be covered as a section in this article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Plenty of smaller landmarks than this one have their own pages, and I see no reason why a proper star-fort shouldn't have it's own page like the rest do. The goal is precisely to provide every fort in Portugal with its own article. Wareno (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since there was no movement on this discussion, I've moved the article to draft, until enough sourcing can be included to meet notability criteria.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing the merge discussion, given the uncontested objection and no support; improved referencing (now in the draft) seems to be the last position reached. Klbrain (talk) 08:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]