Talk:Carl Amari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Carl Amari is my boss.. Iam putting the page up for him. Any copywrites from hollywood 360 are owned by him and I will put it on the Article as a reference. Carl approved this article for me to publish.

Sara Court

Permission for text[edit]

--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carl Amari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a PR release[edit]

Amari has been involved in numerous controversies over the years. His rights to some old time radio shows have been questioned, and OTR hobbyists have complained about his approach to enforcing his (contested) exclusive licenses. None of this is in the article, which is more resume than encyclopedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:141:300:7C00:65E0:8E36:12CB:96B5 (talk) 13:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting this. I had no idea. Please link these controversies here so I can try to research them and add information to the article. I found one article in the LA Times that talks about a lot of litigation. --DiamondRemley39 (talk) 15:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]