Talk:Callista Gingrich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lead[edit]

The inclusion of “third wife” and “mistress” has been debated on this page in the past. It is a fact primarily about her husband, not her, and belongs on Newt’s page. It’s too much detail in the lead and is in any event mentioned below in the article, in the personal life section. Cindy McCain isn’t introduced as “the second wife of John McCain.” “Married” is a neutral way of describing the relationship that is appropriate for the lead.

Please look back through the Talk history before changing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpworth (talkcontribs) 03:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a person who contributed to the discussion, there was no strong consensus but in the end, what is she known for. Nobody cares that she runs a production company (occasionally) or that she sang in a choir when she was a teenager. What she's know for is being the mistress of Gingrich while he was castigating Clinton for his infidelities. There were efforts by Joe Desantis to scrub this article of any mention of her history there, but this is where we ended up and the article was stable for months before you came back. Mattnad (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
She is known, in large part, for being the wife of Newt Gingrich. Your partisan (and factually incorrect – Clinton was impeached for perjury, not for an extramarital affair, and a review of the totality of Gingrich’s comments on the matter will reveal he focused on the perjury) description is a dead giveaway that you have a hostile view of the subject and are not trying to achieve article neutrality, but instead paint the subject in a negative light. --Rpworth 19:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpworth (talkcontribs)
Simply googling "Calista Gingrich", you find MANY articles, new and old, that address her "third wife" status and the controversy around that. This was an issue on the campaign trail and has been an issue for her her and her husband in the public sphere. Everything that's in there is supported by reliable sources.Mattnad (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Have to agree with Mattnad on this. Tvoz/talk 20:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.gingrichproductions.com/2008/11/about-us/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic content has again been removed and the article semi-protected to prevent its restoration. Please ensure that all content placed in the article is written in your own words, unless drawn from compatibly licensed or public domain sources. The sources that have been copied and closely paraphrased here are fully reserved. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Callista Gingrich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking a neutral editor[edit]

I have been cleaning up this article with edits that are pretty minor (mostly organization and tense changes) but I want to flag the edit I just made to the Ambassador section of Career. The previous version of this section was entirely based on one negative article about her husband and did not cover what Gingrich actually did while in the role of Ambassador to the Holy See. I replaced the section with new text citing multiple sources in what I believe is a neutral tone. However, I am flagging this for help because I am not a neutral party and am seeking a neutral editor to look at this. Joedesantis1 (talk) 14:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joedesantis1, hello, this is not the proper venue to do this. Please use {{request edit}} to do so. Heart (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Or you can use request for comment. Thanks, Heart (talk) 04:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@HeartGlow30797: I think you misunderstood this. Joedesantis1 has already made the edit and is asking someone to review it. Kleinpecan (talk) 04:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kleinpecan, oh sorry, yes I misread this. Thanks for pointing this out! Heart (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kleinpecan, HeartGlow30797, Thank you both. I will keep those tags in mind for the future. Joedesantis1 (talk) 16:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bunga bunga[edit]

Any relationship with Bunga bunga during her stay as the ambassator in Rome? 89.245.24.233 (talk) 04:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]