Talk:CZ 805 BREN

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Shh[edit]

Why is Bren capitalised in the title? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because the manufacturer chose to name it so: CZ 805 BREN A1. My guess is that it is because it looks better than BrEn (standing for Brno - Enfield).Cimmerian praetor (talk) 06:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not follow orders of external companies, and policy is pretty clear that trademarks should not be capitalized. --84.189.84.17 (talk) 02:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Type[edit]

The rate of fire of CZ 805 Bren is in range of a Submachine gun, I think it's better to sort it into SMGs group too! Hayyanhami (talk) 11:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Divide into CZ 805 BREN and CZ BREN 2[edit]

I think there are a lot of differences between CZ 805 BREN and CZ BREN 2. It will be better to divide the page into two separate pages with the correct infobox, specifications, and users. Delasoto (talk) 22:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]