Talk:British Rail Class 144

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

removal[edit]

I removed this

"144001 and 144005 have been repainted and now carry Northern Rail's blue livery."

I don't know how to explain this easily - I'm not saying the repaint is irrelevent, but adding piecemeal information isn't the way a real encyclopedia does it. ie this is not a diary.

It's important to keep this information since when all have been replainted we can say something like "between year1 and year2 the fleet were repainted"

Also please remember that in 1 years time the info will be 1 year out of date - so please supply dates for things.

Thanks.FengRail (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removal no.2[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Rail_Class_144&diff=279619948&oldid=279612270

"New Trains have now just been rebranded. Class 144 001 is the first one to be repainted in Northern Rail Livery and there will be more to come."

When? What does it mean "New Nrains", also see Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball and the section above.

Gallery[edit]

Do we really want to see a photograph of the coupler?! The interior of the MSO vehicles features a different layout than the DMSO vehicles. Also there was a shot of a two car unit and another of a three car unit. I could use one of a three car in Northern livery or just the exterior/outside of the MSO vehicle, to show the plain blue bodyside. --Peter Skuce (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well it does raise the question of how technical should Wikipedia be? Should we include a full description of the construction? should there be a focus on the political and economic climate that lead to the order? should there be more on the mechanics of the train? Should every subtle difference in livery and interior layout be noted? IMO there needs to be a balance between all of these? Oh and reference everything :) --Enotayokel (talk) 21:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on British Rail Class 144. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class 144. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Preservation[edit]

Can we find sources for the preserved units? The section may have to be removed otherwise. SK2242 (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Neith-Nabu (talk) 16:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]