Talk:British Emperor

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brytenwalda[edit]

No mention of this title in the article seems a little odd. 89.241.50.186 (talk) 15:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forked Article[edit]

This article was forked out from the Emperor article for edits to the contents of this article before Revision of "British Emperor" as of 12:57, 14 March 2006 by user:Francis Schonken See Revision of "Emperor" as of 22:39, 11 March 2006 by user:Neddyseagoon

This note is so that if there is a copyright issue the text can be tracked back through the Emperor article --Philip Baird Shearer 18:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imperium maius[edit]

See Talk:Emperor/Archive 1#Imperium maius

Proposed titles for George III[edit]

Instead of putting Emperor of the Birtish and Irish and Emperor of the British and Hanoverian Dominions into this article, I would like to create a new one called "Proposed Imperial Titles for George III" or something. How does that sound? CharlesMartel 20:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)CharlesMartel[reply]

I'd go with just merging the two into this one, it would fit fine in the article as is without creating a seperate article. At any rate the information would just work as well if it were mentioned in the George III article instead of a seperate article. Radagast83 06:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible opening paragraph[edit]

The characterisation British Emperor (or: British Empress), that is: being British and also being Emperor/Empress can only be applied to very few people, as Britain's monarchs are indicated as king or queen (latin: rex/regina) in almost all cases.

My edit is tentative, though, but I felt it would look better than that. Snapdragonfly 11:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]