Talk:Brideshead Revisited (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

University of Oxford

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Screening July 2008[edit]

I went to a pre-screening of this 2008 upcoming film adaptation of Waugh's "Brideshead Revisited" in Cambridge. It was Waugh at his most complicated (religion, sexuality, etc.) but the cast performed brilliantly. The film isn't for every rock and roller, but it's a more modern take on the novel. The major characters were especially brilliant. Matthew Goode and Hayley Atwell were especially sharp in their roles. Emma Thompson was her usual brilliant self. Quite frankly, so were the other players, equally brilliant.

There was an discussion with Matthew Goode and Hayley Atwell after the pre-screening and they were quite interesting in person. One person in the audience asked, if one remembers correctly, something to the effect of how one might have the audacity to make a film adaptation after such a brilliant TV series with Jeremy Irons back in the 1980s ... and Ms. Atwell cleverly but kindly began her answer with "Although I'm tempted to laugh ..." which was appropriate. Things get re-made and have a new twist all the time. All just a Midsummer's Night's report from America. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brideshead Revisited (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090504075816/http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117937762.html?categoryid=31&cs=1 to http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117937762.html?categoryid=31&cs=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]