Talk:Brad Miller (politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

anon[edit]

An anon added and an endorser of the Genocide Intervention Network to a bunch of pages.

Don't want to revert if it's true.

Mikereichold 07:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He is listed on their page. [1] Ted 04:00, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign ad[edit]

Although lying about his Republican opponent got Brad elected to Congress, it also got him sued for libel and defamation. The judge found Brad Miller guilty of "negative character assassination" and said Brad's campaign ad "was drafted with the knowledge that it was false and deceptive." The Superior Court summed up the case this way: "While the truth was staring Miller in the face, it appears Miller deliberately elected to cut, paste, and leave out the truth." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.97.8.70 (talk) 18:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

I was trolling for missing infoboxes, and this one looks good. missing infobox=yes if you so desireDUBJAY04 21:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Miller (congressman)[edit]

Shouldn't this article be moved to Brad Miller (politician)? I have seen no other members of Congress with common names classified as "congressman," only as "politician" or "American politician."--Gloriamarie (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

quotes[edit]

Is a quotes section really needed? Kirkian77 (talk) 02:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • remove I don't really think it is needed. They are not truly notable and are not cited, either. Seems almost like a campaign piece. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 03:09, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • remove I agree. A political positions section would be more useful for the purposes of this article than a quotes section.Kirkian77 (talk) 17:40, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]