Talk:Blyk

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is all marketing!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.156.49.128 (talk) 09:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, why is this page allowed?! How do flag this page as inappropriate? 130.88.117.230 (talk) 09:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you join Blyk then you receive paperwork which says that you HAVE signed a contract - see item 2 in the 'Read the rules' documentation. This contradicts the claim in the wikipedia entry.

"Of course you do. Any transaction is a contact, even a free one, as per the legal rights of the customer and the retailer."

"I am on Blyk and have received no such paper work and have signed no contract"

130.88.117.230 (talk) 09:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal issues, not for Wikipedia[edit]

This and similar lines have been added to this page:

"It is currently suffering major problems with the delivery of MMS brand messages and consequently initial registration with the network, affecting a large number of users. This problem has been ongoing since early July and there has been no offical word from Blyk as to the availability of a solution."

Notwithstanding the lack of any reference, this is not the type of information that should be included in Wikipedia, nor does it meet the NPOV requirement. At the very least, adding it as the first paragraph gives it undue weight, which is another reason it should not be inserted as it was. Can anyone see any reason why this should be put back into the main page? --86.133.252.132 (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blyk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Status[edit]

This article is written in the present tense. The service no longer exists, seemingly disappearing. Can anyone update the article please? DAY ^TALK 21:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]