Talk:Blue, Green, and Waterfront Lines (Cleveland)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title?[edit]

It doesn't make any sense to me to use this title if that's not the current name of the lines. I can see the logic of combining both into a single article, I suppose, though perhaps it would make more sense to either put all the RTA light rail into one article (i.e. integrate the Waterfront Line material here) or separate the blue and green lines into different articles. --Jfruh 03:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, I'm thinking that I'm going to do what I've said above, since nobody seems to object. My proposal is to merge together this page and material on the Waterfront Line page into a signle page called "Blue and Green Lines (Cleveland)". I'll do this sometime next week if nobody objects. --Jfruh (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the better title is "Light Rail Lines, Cleveland." This is because, although operationally, the Waterfront Line is an extension of the Blue & Green lines (and RTA acknowledges this in its literature), it still designates the Waterfront Line as an entity in itself, ... for the obvious reason that it wants to give it a higher profile by naming it its destination. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.197.170.126 (talk • contribs)

Well, the only problem with that is that it wouldn't be in parrallel with the naming of the Red Line (Cleveland) page. NYC railfans tend to make a distinction between services (which are the named routes that trains take) and lines (which are physical pieces of trains infrastructure). Thus, the Blue and Green Lines in Cleveland are services, part of whose route covers the Waterfront Line, which is a line, if that makes sense. Obviously the Waterfront Line should be given prominent attention and named as such in any combined article, but it makes sense to me name them by their services. Either that or rename the Red Line page "Heavy Rail, Cleveland" or some such. --Jfruh (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JFruh - your renaming suggestion to retitle this article "Green and Blue Lines (Cleveland)" and merge the Waterfront Line article into this one makes sense to me. Go for it. -- CHIP72 19:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the term Shaker Heights Rapid Transit denotes the archaic name of the line pre-GCRTA taking it over. This should be renamed into an article for the Blue, Green, and Waterfront Line just to clarify it for people who were not around during the time of pre-GCRTA. Cwmtos 12:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since nobody seems to object, I'm going to make this move. --Jfruh (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Waterfront line should be treated as its own line because its was built seperatly from the Shaker Rapid and has a dedicated Brenda Car assinged to it

Image copyright problem with Image:GCRTA.svg[edit]

The image Image:GCRTA.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Blue and Green Lines (Cleveland). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blue and Green Lines (Cleveland). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Blue,_Green,_and_Waterfront_Lines_(Cleveland)&oldid=1198060567"