Talk:Blackhawks (DC Comics)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Why a new article?[edit]

I don't really see a point in this being a seperate article. It'll be a stub/start article forever. It's a reboot of the Blackhawk (DC Comics) concept. The fact that there are no ties in terms of continuity doesn't make it a separate thing. The concept is the same - a government/extra paramilitary group run by Checkmate and employed by various things. || Tako (talk) 02:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I'd agree, except there appears to be no connection between this "reboot" and the long-established Blackhawk character (for which the original article, Blackhawk (DC Comics), is named). Yes, a very basic premise is shared, but if you take a quick look at Blackhawk (DC Comics), you'll see the article's been growing pretty dramatically as it examines all the different versions of the original team — and I still have significant territory to cover. I believe that when this new article is fleshed out with an origin summary, character discussion, and crossover details — not to mention the fact DC is likely to continue on with these new characters — a separate article will be more than warranted. I'm thinking that cramming wholly-unrelated characters and situations into the existing Blackhawk (DC Comics) article is just going to cause more confusion than it clears up. DoctorSivana (talk) 05:12, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blackhawks (DC Comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64hEz5q0J?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdcu.blog.dccomics.com%2F2012%2F01%2F12%2Fdc-comics-in-2012-%25E2%2580%2593-introducing-the-%25E2%2580%259Csecond-wave%25E2%2580%259D-of-dc-comics-the-new-52%2F to http://dcu.blog.dccomics.com/2012/01/12/dc-comics-in-2012-%e2%80%93-introducing-the-%e2%80%9csecond-wave%e2%80%9d-of-dc-comics-the-new-52/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]