Talk:Bicycle Quarterly

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Cycling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spelling[edit]

The spelling of the article title needs to be corrected. WWGB 02:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prod-nn Tag Should be Removed[edit]

This tag should be removed immediately. The Velo News reference is, by itself, enough to establish notability. Bicycle Quarterly is used as a reliable reference in several bicycle-related Wikipedia articles and is an important source for testing, design and other technical information related to bicycles. Ebikeguy (talk) 18:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per instructions in the Prod-nn tag, "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason," I will be removing it for reasons expressed above. Note also that the tag states, "If this template is removed, it should not be replaced," so reinstating this tag will be a violation of Wikipedia rules and will be immediately reverted. Ebikeguy (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not get the chance to delete the tag, because Arxiloxos beat me to it, for reasons presented in the "History" log. Thank you! Ebikeguy (talk) 18:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Circulation; 6,075. Analysis in secondary sources; none. Abductive (reasoning) 18:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the Notability Tag[edit]

This article now has references to an article exclusively about Bicycle Quarterly (BQ) in Bicycle Times (circulation 46K), to a major cycling book, The Dancing Chain, that specifically used information from BQ in evaluating 20 derailleurs, and to other reliable sources. Adventure Cyclist, which published Jan's research on tire pressure from BQ, has a circulation of 44.5K, as published here. I think it is time to remove the notability tag. Thanks. Ebikeguy (talk) 05:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since this note has been up for a week with no objections. I will now go ahead and remove the notability tag. Ebikeguy (talk) 19:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for temoving the tag. I'm traveling at the moment so didn't have a chance to comment untill now, but I support removing the tag. --Keithonearth (talk) 11:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]