Talk:Berkeley Public Library

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I added a history to the site. What else could the article use? Exhartland 07:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure; perhaps you'll consider helping on the Oakland Public Library article? Paul Haymon 00:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly the number of books/resources (and type thereof) currently at the library? Paul Haymon 02:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Architectural significance[edit]

Something should be written about the architecture. For instance, in 1998, Page & Turnbull called the building's sgraffito the best work of its kind in Northern California. Binksternet (talk) 23:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Berkeley Public Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Berkeley Public Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Construction and opening dates[edit]

There was a IP editor question at the help desk about the construction date of the library.

I have found a small error in your description of the library. In your "history" section, it is listed as opening / relocating to the kittredge location in 1934. The year was 1930 and the opening was in 1931. It is listed correctly in the side / detail section but not in the main text.

I did a little research and it appears that the previous building at the site was demolished in 1930, and the new building designed in 1930. Construction started in 1931 and was completed in 1934. This will require multiple sources to piece together. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 19:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I modified the article to address the construction dates, to best match the available sourcing. There is one discrepancy - the Library of Congress source [[1]] says construction began in 1929. I think this was just when they decided to start with the demolition planning, and filed for a demolition permit. They couldn't have built it if the architectural plans weren't approved until 1930. But if you can find better sourcing, have a go at it. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 19:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]