A fact from Bere Ferrers rail accident appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that ten New Zealand soldiers lost their lives in 1917 in the Bere Ferrers rail accident due to being unaccustomed to the British railway system?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
I did not follow the British Railways system bit. What is different about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.7.248.129 (talk) 08:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"The inquest revealed that the men, unaccustomed to British railways, believed that as they had entered the train from that side, they should also leave from the same side." (and by the way, you need to sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes ~~~~ to achieve a signature) Schwede66 09:43, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I read this text "The inquest revealed that the men, unaccustomed to British railways, believed that as they had entered the train from that side, they should also leave from the same side" but still do not really understand it. Is this something special about British Rail, and what is the thing that is special? Here in Melbourne, Australia most suburban stations are two platform, but some are a single island platform: you get out on the side with the platform. The picture shows what appears to be a double platform arrangement so wouldn't it be natural to get out on the side with the platform and not get out on the side with another trackway. Is there something different about British rail - or is it that New Zealand doesn't have a lot of railways? Format (talk) 06:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A few google searches reveals several reports that give much the same information. I have altered the wording of this article keeping within what the various articles say. Previously this article as worded suggested there was rule peculiar to British Railways about what side you alight from a train carriage - without elaborating on what rule the soldiers should have followed. However I do not think there is anything unusual about the British Railway system and no special rule about it. From my understanding it seems the soldiers simply had little knowledge of train systems per se, they had little understanding of the speed of British trains, and no idea of the geographic area - meaning they assumed when the train stopped that was their destination, even though it wasn't. Format (talk) 07:03, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
