Talk:Behavioral cusp

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The validity of this stuff? Anyone knowledgeable about this stuff think its valid? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.42.44.135 (talk) 04:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

√== Interesting ==

This is an interesting concept. Well done for writing it! Can you please add, in the leading paragraph, a summary of what a behavioural cusp actually is? The paragraph describes what it isn't and related issues. Also, the formatting could be tidied up, especially "The following properties are special features"... --- Rixs (talk) 10:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I've put my money where my mouth is, and done that already. --- Rixs (talk) 10:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not accurate at all. I'm not even sure where most of these ideas came from. Check it against the peer reviewed journal article on the topic! http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jaba/articles/1997/jaba-30-03-0533.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.0.32.66 (talk) 02:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]