Talk:Begging (Prohibition) Act, 1962

A fact from Begging (Prohibition) Act, 1962 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in Nepal, it is against the law to beg?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Begging (Prohibition) Act, 1962.

Wikipedia

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 00:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

A kid begging

... that in Nepal, it is against the law to beg (example pictured)?

Reviewed: Black Swan (song)

Created by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 18:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Article is new enough, just barely long enough (prose check tool gives 1593 characters), image is free and used in the article, hook is interesting and short enough, and QPQ is done. I've got a few issues with the article, though. It needs a GOCE run through, there's some rough phrasing in places. However, some of the references don't quite seem to back stuff up. Reference 3, to the Kathmandu post, is used to cite an event happening in 2018, but the article was published in 2014. I just don't think the article is quite to the state yet, due to the hook itself being cited to a source with a problem. Hog Farm (talk) 03:50, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hog Farm, I have fixed the issues raised above. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Good to go now. Hog Farm (talk) 19:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]