Talk:Becontree tube station/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 22:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Giving a look. —Ed!(talk) 22:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written:
- Dab links, external links tools show no problems. Copyio tool returns green. I do note some duplicate links though if those could be removed.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- It is broad in its coverage:
- Not Yet
- Geography: Any chance for details on local population in a walking distance to this station or ridership along the line?
- History: What was the construction company that built the initial station? How much did it cost?
- I do think it's worthwhile to add a bit about the growth of the neighborhoods around this station. From an urban development perspective, that is very relavent to the story of what brought service here and why it has continued. this source for instance would provide some great context.
- "The station was refurbished by Metronet in 2006." -- What was the cost here, or of the larger refurbishment program that this was part of?
- Per WP:IPC I'm not thinking the current section on that is necessary, and moreover a single sentence doesn't really justify it. I'd suggest turning it into a note and including it somewhere in the history section.
- Any chance for station succession data (neighboring stations) as is included in many NYC Metro station articles?
- What exactly is this? Are you thinking of a routebox - the article already has one, at Becontree tube station#Further reading. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not Yet
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is stable:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- Pass Four images cited to CC where appropriate.
- Other:
Perfect, thanks for the work! Going to Pass the GAN based on the above responses and additions to the article. Thanks! —Ed!(talk) 20:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)