Talk:BeForU

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AFD closing note[edit]

I have closed the AFD for this and related article as keep. However:

  • Sources need to be added to this and related articles, in order to comply with wikipedia's policies,
  • Editors more involved with music related articles should consider if readers would be better served by merging some of the song/album articles, so that the available information doesn't have to be repeated and scattered over multiple pages.

Abecedare (talk) 17:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have, as I'm sure the editors that were involved in the deletion debate have, taken your notes into consideration. However, Keeps are not issued with caveats. The article (assuming that all deletion debates are handled the same way) was declared keep-able because it met with the necessary standard of an article to keep it (at least that's what's suppose to happen). It was not kept because more people cried keep than delete. There's work that needs to be done to this and a billion other articles, yes, but what do you set out to accomplish by putting this 'eye on you' notice here after deciding that the article was a clear keep? I've turned your notes into article notice templates as they're more suited for that kind of thing I think. But if you want to formally suggest any merges, you do it. The single and album articles I found are all notable according to the Music project and they're substantial enough to be improved rather than sewn together or culled.  æronphonehome  16:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above points are not caveats to the AFD closing or "eye on you notice" (not sure what gave you that idea). They are simply suggestions on how this group of articles can be improved and brought into compliance with wikipedia policies. Since I am not particularly interested in the topic per se, I'll leave it to the involved editors to adopt them if they wish to devote the time and effort to make the coverage encyclopedic. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 18:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BeForU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BeForU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:BeForU&oldid=1206219282"