This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catalan-speaking countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history, languages, and cultures of Catalan-speaking countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Catalan-speaking countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesTemplate:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesCatalan-speaking countries articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta articles
The term Angevin Empire is standardly used for the possessions of Henry II of England and his immediate successors, and not for those of Charles of Anjou - even though his supporters are commonly referred to as Angevins. I've replaced it with the Kingdom of Naples in the list of combatants - which is the relevant political entity, even if the term is anachronistic in this context.
PWilkinson 17:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It appears sources conflict on the month of the battle. The existing sources and the article had July 8th. Today it was changed to June 8th citing this paper. I've reverted the change until we can sort things out. I know it's not definitive, but a Google search for June 8 returns "about 7 results", while a
Google search for July 8 returns "about 11,000 results". Thoughts? Mojoworker (talk) 21:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]