Talk:Battle of Baekgang

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.

Japan: Military history Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:40, April 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Chinese / Japanese / Korean / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

The map is wrong[edit]

Date: 28/01/2013 The maps shown is not the time of mid-7th century but 5th century or early 6th century. Gaya since 532AD had been conquered, became a part of Silla. Someone with good resource, please change the map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.112.169 (talk) 10:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two battles?[edit]

Um, doesn't this page now contain information about two different battles? The Battle of Hwangsanbeol in 660 is quite notable, but entirely different from the 663 clash. -- Visviva 02:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. The information currently in this battle regards battle of Baekgang, while I created a seperate article of Battle of Hwangsanbeol in 660. However, more information needs to be integrated in the Battle of Hwangsanbeol article. Deiaemeth 02:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it hurts to remove information about the Battle of Hwangsanbeol. Good friend100 18:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major Edits[edit]

I am working on some major edits to this article. Please make comments here if you believe the article can use improvement. WangKon936 11:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Excellent work, my friend. When I first came upon this article many months ago, I feared that it could never be expanded. Thank you very much for your efforts. LordAmeth 08:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct Numbers?[edit]

The 130,000 Tang troops listed seem to be the total number operating in all of the Korean pennisular, rather than sailors involved directly in this engagement given they only had 170 ships.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Baekgang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Date Calculation[edit]

Dates are wrong throughout the article because the dates of the lunisolar calendar are given as the dates of the solar calendar. Thus, the battle actually took place in October 663, not in August. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.160.37.187 (talk) 05:39, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this article is in critical - CRITICAL - need of inline refs[edit]

This is terrible. When editing, go ahead and add the reference at the same time. Some of this stuff is going on six years with citation tags! 50.111.26.236 (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Baekje royalty who fled to Japan weren't given the same (royalty) ranks and titles in the Yamato court[edit]

Baekje royalty were ranked at third place of Yamato court nobility. <ref> "Chronicle of Japan, Continued"(続日本紀)天平神護2年6月28日条　<ref>"Chronicle of Japan"(日本書紀)持統天皇5年正月7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 長岡輝久男 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]