Talk:Bartow–Pell Mansion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bartow-Pell Mansion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bartow–Pell Mansion
Bartow–Pell Mansion

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 16:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bartow–Pell Mansion; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Well done - the image is clear and free, the qpq is done. The article is neutral and cited. ALT0 is interesting, confirmed and cited in the article. The article was expanded from 2009 characters to 34,756 and it was nominated within the time period. Note: Earwig is not working for me today so this will need to be checked. Bruxton (talk) 15:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Earwig is now working - 18%. Bruxton (talk) 20:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Robert Bartow[edit]

The lede says that "Robert Bartow, a descendant of Thomas Pell, built the third and current house at some point between 1836 and 1842", but the Thomas Pell article says that Pell died without children. One of these things can't be true – please could someone with knowledge of the subject check? Brammers (talk/c) 22:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: forgot to say, super article. It was a pleasure to read. Good luck with the GA nom. Brammers (talk/c) 22:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for bringing this up, and sorry for my delay in responding. Yeah, the NY Times article technically says that Bartow was a descendant of Pell, but I think he was not a direct descendant; rather, Bartow would most likely have been descended from the Pell family through Thomas Pell's brother. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bartow–Pell Mansion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 01:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 17:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments[edit]

Image and source review[edit]

  • All images are good CosXZ (talk) 16:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • All references are styled well CosXZ (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Using a random number generator between 1-182 for a source check, will be checking 13 sources CosXZ (talk) 18:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    [78] Green tickY
    [168] Green tickY A classic source
    [58] Green tickY Official government division
    [6] Green tickY Couldn't access but, at that time of publication, the New York Herald Tribune had a very good reputation
    [166] Green tickY A classic source
    [25] Green tickY I am not sure about this source even if is isn't a SPS
    Twomey was a borough historian who wrote several books about the Bronx. Epicgenius (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Feel way more comfortable calling this source a reliable source CosXZ (talk) 22:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    [23] Green tickY Isn't a SPS which is good and the author has a street named after him so, that means he has done good works
    [182] Green tickY A classic source
    [163] Green tickY A classic source
    [118] Green tickY Good author
    [27] Green tickY I don't trust a newspaper that published a Hoax
    The hoax was published 80 years before the newspaper article in question was published. I will remove it if there's further evidence that the Sun consistently published hoaxes even through the 20th century. However, in general, newspapers from the early 19th century were less accurate than today, and they occasionally published embellished or false articles to drum up attention. Epicgenius (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay CosXZ (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think The Sun has redeemed itself CosXZ (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    [147] Green tickY Official government division
    [61] Not sure. I looked up Lockwood Barr and the search results showed a singer not a historian

Overal this passes 2C CosXZ (talk) 22:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig[edit]

Earwig Shows 18.7% CosXZ (talk) 16:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]