Talk:BarbieGirls.com

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BarbieGirls.com article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Page Cleanup[edit]

I went through and cleaned the page up. Hope no one minds. I made sure to keep it generally unbiased and neutral. Lenore Schwartz 03:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now it reads like a commercial advertisement. --Ettrig (talk) 17:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it still reads like an ad. It says "designed just for girls" I'm sure this does not refer to girls around the world, i.e. outside a North American/European context. Why would you need the phrase "just for girls" unless you're trying to push a product on impressionable young minds? Why not simply say "targeted at pre-teen and teenage females from reasonably high-income families living in North America and Europe"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.133.212 (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]