Talk:Barberenachampsa

	Paleontology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this redirect.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Barberenachampsa is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this redirect to improve its quality.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Nomen nudum[edit]

Dilkes and Arcucci (2012) as well as Langer et al. (2007) regard the name "Barberenachampsa" as a nomen nudum. Dilkes and Arcucci (2012) mentioned that name once: "P. nodosa has been placed in a new genus Barberenachampsa by Kischlat (2000), but the name is invalid because it was not formally introduced as a new taxon". Furthermore, any paper I know of, even Kischlat and Schultz (1999) treat P. nodosa as a species of Proterochampsa, so I think we should redirect "Barberenachampsa" page to Proterochampsa. If someone disagrees, please let me know... Rnnsh (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]