This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
Similar to the question I asked at Talk:Ian Chesterton — the following was recently commented out of this article:
Jacqueline Hill returned to the series in 1980, guest starring in the Fourth Doctor serial Meglos as the priestess Lexa.
Again, I understand the reasoning (it's about Jacqueline Hill, not Barbara Wright), but I think it's worth some discussion among Doctor Who editors. Relevant? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'll put it back. It may not be specifically relevant, but it's still reasonably useful information. --El Zoof 04:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't object to the removal per se — I just think it's worth talking about. I could go either way, myself. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
