Talk:Bajaj Pulsar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

???[edit]

I am a lighter bike owner and thinking of buying a heavier bike for sometimes now.The power and pick-up of the Pulsar 180 has no doubt impressed everyone.But the structure of the bike is keeping me on tenterhooks.

Can't KB come out with a 180 or 170cc bike that has its legendary power but a natural,easy commuter bike structure? I am looking for something that will be comfortable on long journeys in double ride on the highway.And I am not impressed by their Sports bike marketing strategy.It gives a "different" feeling all right but in the bottom line it is not comfortable in long rides.That is simply a wastage of potential of the 180cc.

About Cruiser bikes of KB,the less said the better.Most reviews agree that they are difficult to control and turn in busy city traffic.I think KB will be even more successful if they pay some attention to utility and less to image.

nairit1@indiatimes.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.11.120.97 (talkcontribs) 12:36 28 March 2006

Quality[edit]

there are some disputes bout the quality of this article has downgraded the bikes quality standard in a biased manner which is infact superior than most of it's competitor. (better than Honda Unicorn).

Many local auto magazines have rated the bike to be very efficient mostly because of it's smooth gearbox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.233.105 (talkcontribs) 09:04, 2 September 2006

editing[edit]

To the IP (anonymous) editors: Why not actually WORK on this article, rather than blank it? VikÞor | Talk 17:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cut stuff[edit]

I removed the following sections from the main part of the article:

Though Pulsar DTS-i has been selling well – it sold around 3.85 lakh in the last fiscal – Bajaj is eager to finish off the slower selling rival Hero Honda's Karizma, which has a 223 CC engine model, and is a slightly more powerful but very costly bike. The existing Pulsar comes fitted with two engine variants – 180 CC and 150 CC.

The new Pulsar with all these new features offers serious competition to its rival, Hero Honda Karisma which offers only 225 CC and 17bhp with no fuel injection or rear disc brake. Bajaj has outsold Hero Honda only in 100 cc and 150 cc segments because of their lower quality, ingeniously designed cheap bikes which always seem to have problem matching up with the high quality of Hero Honda bikes. The bikes sell only because they are much cheaper than the competition and are available at 0% interest rate. It would be interesting to see how capable the new Pulsar is against the Karisma in performance and endurance.

If someone wants to put a sction in regarding comparisons between the Bajaj Pulsar and Honda Karisma, feel free to put these back in, though they will need to be more NPOV.

VikÞor | Talk 23:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links improvement[edit]

Can we get more authoritative links? Whoever put the blog together is doing a fine job but where did he get his information? Links to blogs are discouraged per WP:EL, original press info and/or manufacturer's specs would be much better. -- Brianhe 02:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong year in the main picture[edit]

This picture is of my bike which is a September 2004 150 DTSi model... how can it become 2007 model!! Reverting to the original model year. If you have a new picture, pls change it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Viveksinha in (talkcontribs) 02:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Technology????[edit]

I agree with the info about DTSi and Exhaustec technology in Pulsar article, but Fuel Injection? It seems out of place in a bike article which is not even using it (as of 10 April 2007, Pulsar DTS-Fi is not launched). I think another article needs to be dedicated for the same instead of putting it in this article. Chintu rohit 16:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Call for fix[edit]

This needs to be fixed in section 2006: "... improved gear shift feel. cc variants.". --Mortense (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bajaj Pulsar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bajaj Pulsar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Bajaj Pulsar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bajaj pulsar ns 200[edit]

Please upgrade our Bajaj pulsar ns 200 speedometer plz 2402:8100:2454:ECD7:7DF1:68:3B85:2765 (talk) 04:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]