A fact from Bach Archive appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Peter Wollny was copied or moved into Bach Archive with this edit on 07:37, 11 March 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
The article was just moved from Bach-Archiv Leipzig to Bach Archiv Leipzig. I don't find support for that on the official website. Btw, the last ref, not well formatted, is no longer in the "news" of that website. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nor the logo nor the name on the building has a hyphen (see images in article). --Francis Schonken (talk) 08:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
re. "I don't find support for that on the official website" - that's because you only look at the German website of the Bach Archive, the English-language version of the website omits all these hyphens ([1])
I suppose in English it can be safely put as Bach Archive, that's how the Bach Archive puts it on their own website (that is the English-language one). --Francis Schonken (talk) 08:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's much better than introducing unsourced wrong German. But are you sure it's the only Bach archive worthy of an article? And isn't Leipzig part of the name? Have Bach Archive Leipzig, at least as a redirect. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whether it's the only one that will have an article at en.wikipedia I don't know, but the Leipzig one would be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC while by far the most famous one.
Whether Leipzig is part of the name I don't know: the English-language webpage of the Bach Archive (see link above) uses both Leipzig Bach Archive and Bach Archive (without Leipzig), so the last name would work whatever the official name. --Francis Schonken (talk) 14:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
