Talk:Baby Geniuses

Untitled

This commentary (although cut) cannot be real, and therefore should be removed. IT'S FUNNY AS HELL, THOUGH! -thealexfish 9/13

• I think this came from The Onion, though I'm not sure. It certainly isn't real, and I'm cutting it. R 03:06, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
  • OK now the article looks like any other crappy flavorless movie stub. Not that this film deserves to have a decent Wikipedia article anyways. 66.41.212.243 11:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

POV

Taken from the article:

The film was financially successful...

$27 million isn't what I would call financially successful, plus it's a POV. --Bears54 03:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Everythings relative... Think about how much it cost to make first. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ran4 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC).

Relative nothing. By Hollywood accounting standards this movie only just broke even. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.239.18.132 (talk) 10:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Film Series?

Until now I didn't realize that the recent direct to video films were episodes of an intended TV series. Given that, does this qualify for a related film series article Baby Geniuses (film series)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.251.111.47 (talk) 19:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Baby Geniuses. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1999/1999st.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)