Talk:Béla IV of Hungary/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 14:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written

a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct

b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

The article is well-written indeed. I made some minor changes per MOS:DATEFORMAT. Otherwise, the article is well-written. Very impressive.

Verifiable with no original research

a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

c. It contains no original research

The article uses book and journal sources, all of which are listed and contain the necessary source or reference information. However, I would I suggest listing Scoble's book under the "Sources" section and then use Harvard references, like the rest of the article does.

Broad in its coverage

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic

b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail

The article is nicely broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.

Neutral

It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

The article is neutral and does not include personal opinions or statements.

Stable

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

The article is stable, its content does not change significantly from day to day, and is not the subject of edit wars or content disputes. However, I would suggest blocking or throw yet another edit warning to 68.104.190.37 to prevent him or her from editing this page in case edits like this occur again.

Illustrated

a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

The article is nicely illustrated with a total of fourteen images all of which contain the necessary information. The bulk of the images are public domains and uploaded to Commons.

Pass, fail or hold?

With the article meeting the GA-criteria I'm going to pass it. Excellent job people. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 15:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image templates[edit]

Borsoka, the article has some template problems which I missed in my GA-review that needs to be fixed.

File:Ondra Gertruda.jpg
File:AlzbetaKumanska kralovna.jpg
File:Bela4 pecet3.jpg

These three images have broken templates. Can you fix it, please? Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 14:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jonas Vinther, thank you very much for your message. I approached a fellow editor for assistance, because I am unable to deal with these issues. He has always helped. Borsoka (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds great, Borsoka, I would just appreciate it this happened A.S.A.P. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 15:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And Borsoka, please message me when it's done. Thanks so much. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 16:14, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I jumped in and corrected them. Qorilla (talk) 18:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Jonas Vinther, Fakirbakir also informed me that the problem was fixed. Borsoka (talk) 04:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent job people. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 05:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth[edit]

Hungarian WP says he was born 29 November 1206. Can we confirm this? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 23:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]