Talk:Autism CARES Act of 2014

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Autism CARES Act of 2014. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About a criticism section[edit]

I see autistic advocates on the net repeatedly speak out against this bill for reportedly funding cure development and maybe development of technology that would detect autism in fetuses, which in turn are spoken out against by neurodiversity advocates as something akin to a final solution (my words based on comparisons between the consequences they describe of such developments and actual instances in history).

I don't know how true these allegations about A-CARES are, and I don't know where to start looking, but I do think that an encyclopedia about autism topics should at least look into this kind of thing. If it's true or false, we should at least give it a passing mention with some good sources, unless it's not notable enough for the purposes of this page in an encyclopedia. (This could be said of a number of autism pages on Wikipedia, I'm just mentioning it here because this is where I am now.)

To wrap things up I don't know much about WP's policies and guidelines, or a sense of when/how IAR should come into play. In any case I'm not sure I want to do this all on my own, as I've got strong opinions on this and WP ain't the place for that, but I do think we should double-check if this is notable, again, for the sake of making a better encyclopedia. If this is already talked out elsewhere on WP please direct me to that talk page or whatnot in a reply or so.

Thanks ThreefoldTaco (talk) 01:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]