Talk:Audio-Technica

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adding content[edit]

This article can be significantly expanded.

  • History - as a starting point there is a brief history of Audio-Technica on their website [1]
  • Add sections, possibly use Shure as template
  • Add at beginning This article is about Audio-Technica, the Japanese audio equipment manufacturer, for Ars Technica a technology website, see Ars Technica. Done
  • Properly attribute statement "One of their most famous products was a battery-operated, portable record player called Mister Disc that was sold in the U.S. in the early 1980s"
  • Add image of an Audio-Technica microphone for illustrative purposes Done

AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I figured there was no chance for confusion between this and Ars Technica, seeing as the first word isn't alike at all. No one confuses, say, Acer Computer with Apple Computer, right? But other people seem to not agree with me. Thoughts? --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure: I reverted your change and noted "titles share enough similarity to cause confusion especially w/ use of 'Technica'" in the edit summary. In this case, 'Technica' is a less ubiquitous term than your example of computer. Anecdotally, in the past I have confused the names Ars Technica with Audio Technica, which lead me note that at the beginning of the article. Encyclopedia users may only have a vague idea of what they are looking for, I believe it would better help readers to note if a non-common, fairly unique term such as 'Technica' may refer to Ars Technica or Audio Technica. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, no, I really don't think that hatnote is necessary. The "Audio" part is distinguishing enough. I am removing it. —Darkwind (talk) 23:50, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

add this as a source[edit]

many facts lacking citation can be verified on audio-technica's history page About Audio-Technica : History

Accessed -- 30 July 2009

andyzweb (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Audio-Technica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Audio-Technica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]