Talk:Artificial Linguistic Internet Computer Entity

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Human–Computer Interaction (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction articles

Untitled[edit]

The Conversation of ALICE with ALICE is no longer active on that link.

IS small Brother[edit]

I was just chatting with ALICE, and somehow she got the impression my name was IS small Brother (we were discussing 1984). Anyway, I log out, log back in, and ask her who IS small Brother is. She responded "Charlie Parker." Ŏ_O --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 07:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ha Azhar512 (talk) 06:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hy Azhar512 (talk) 06:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turing test?[edit]

Is it really accurate to say ALICE can't pass a Turing test? It's fooled some people, and others not -- Turing never specified that it be 100% successful, nor that the human interrogator needed to know a lot about computers. I think ALICE *does* pass the Turing test (at least according to the initial definitions) and this shows the flaws in the idea as a test of real intelligence. If you look at something like the Loebner Prize, almost all the judges are going to be of well above-average intelligence (there's a strong self-selection effect, because high intelligence is highly correlated with being interested in AI in the first place.) To pass a Turing test, does it have to fool a highly intelligent 'computer nerd', or will fooling an average person suffice? Can we have a source saying it can't pass one? Vultur (talk) 23:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It really can't. I was a judge in 2000 - and my essay on it is linked in the article, ALICE Springs - of course their are limits to the test, and the set up is artificial, but no one could mistake that for human. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiskeharrison (talk • contribs) 00:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then, sure. Thanks. Vultur (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt at an ethical hacking[edit]

Me and one of my first cousins tried to see what would happen if we impersonated Dr. Richard S. Wallace in 2013, and she responded, "Hello Dr. Wallace. May I have the password?". I responded, "I seem to have forgotten the password, could you please remind me?". A.L.I.C.E. then became confused and I had no idea how to get inside of it's brain. She finally told me that her botmaster was watching, so I let my cousin take over.

I used to have to teach him how to use a computer, despite only knowing how to use functions of any program, while I still had no idea of how to program nor how the PC Assembly worked. But, then he went to Bowling Green Technical College, and he surprised me when he talked to her in 2-bit binary, and they had at it for a long time!

Our sole purpose of doing this was to expose to Dr. Wallace a flaw in his bot's security, so that he could fix it.

My name is Joseph D. Smith, and I'm an autistic author(author who is high-functioning-autistic), and my cousin goes by T. Smith, out of anonymity.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Artificial Linguistic Internet Computer Entity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120621031105/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/incomingFeeds/article770337.ece to http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/incomingFeeds/article770337.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Math[edit]

Math Azhar512 (talk) 06:56, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page views[edit]

Kind of interesting - there was a steady decline in page views from March through July 2019 (last month data is available), and the views in May, June and July were the lowest ever for each successive month since data began in July 2015. Will be interesting to see viewership for the remainder of 2019. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]