Talk:Ark (search engine)

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Article seems to favor or advertise, neutrality disputed.[edit]

Article shows favoritism towards Ark search engine. Apparent in the language used to describe the engine, as in the following examples:

"Users can easily manage. . ."

". . . an easy to navigate, stylish platform."

". . . great way to get into contact"

". . . makes managing your email inbox extremely easy"

In addition to biased language, the article seems to contain phrases that commonly signal persuasion or poor writing.

"At first glance Ark looks similar. . ."

"The best part about Ark is the privacy . . ."'

I would guess that this was originally written by the company and cut and pasted to the page. Personal attempts to find material from this article on the Ark website or in a independent review have been unfruitful. Some parts are poorly written and one source is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honesttotodd (talk • contribs) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ark (search engine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513112418/http://www.dailycal.org/2012/05/09/startup-out-of-uc-berkeley-aims-to-revolutionize-people-search/ to http://www.dailycal.org/2012/05/09/startup-out-of-uc-berkeley-aims-to-revolutionize-people-search/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]