Talk:Architecture criticism

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notes[edit]

I'll add some of this in later:

One reason is that there have been theater critics and book critics since time immemorial, but there haven't been architecture critics on daily newspapers since Ada Louise Huxtable was appointed the first full-time architecture critic on the staff of The Times in 1963, forty years ago - although I feel I should point out that Lewis Mumford, perhaps the twentieth century's greatest architecture critic, wrote for The New Yorker for much of the nineteen-thirties, forties and fifties, long before Ada Louise went to The Times. So we have a longer tradition at The New Yorker, where I now am, than The Times does. Not, of course, that I would ever keep score with my former employer. In any event, while there are more architecture critics now than there once were, and several notable ones, there are far too many papers that do not recognize architecture criticism as a legitimate field of arts criticism - that still put architecture writing in with real estate coverage, or perhaps with "home" and "style" coverage. I didn't realize it at the time, but the great contribution that The New York Times made was not merely in hiring Ada Louise Huxtable, it was in asserting that architecture was to be considered one of the arts. [1] --bodnotbod (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Architecture criticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070622164550/http://www.paulgoldberger.com/speeches.php?speech=criticism to http://www.paulgoldberger.com/speeches.php?speech=criticism

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Architecture criticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]