Talk:Arborescent

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Continental philosophy

Hardly a new concept[edit]

As is typical with French postmodernism, they take a pretty old idea and turn it into something they suppose is new by using arcane and abstruse language in order to deceive the gullible. Naturally there is no reference to actual facts. I think I pulled the central concept out in the intro, for what it's worth. Fecknuts (talk) 10:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that tracks with what I usually expect from French philosophy. Looks like there's not much coverage of this topic outside of deleuze, the word arborescent is mostly used to mean "tree-like" with no reference to philosophy. I'll merge this with Rhizome. - car chasm (talk) 14:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]