Talk:Apple of my eye

Untitled

Anyone who knows Old English, please try for a better (more literal) translation of King Alfred's text.

Explanations of etymology and phrases often sound a bit dubious; but without refs for the interpretations, a lot of this article seems like original research. Citations please. 79.70.116.165 (talk) 07:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC) --- this is retarded. apples aren't even round - and there are plenty of truly round things like the moon or whatnot.

you suck. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.149.113 (talk) 03:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The translation of 'applause' given, as 'pupil' is valid, in that the word was used for both a general term for fruit and for the pupil of the eye, but it is not very helpful, because it means that the modern English translation of the quotation which is supposed to be the earliest instance of the phrase 'apple of my eye' does not actually contain the most important word 'apple'.

However, this actually serves to illustrate the fact that whilst this may be an example of an early use of the phrase itself, it is clearly not being used in the sense in which it is used today. The writer here is referring to the actual pupils of someone's eyes, and not a figurative object of someone's affection. Indeed 'applause' occurs only in the plural in this phrase, which is contrary to the phrase's definition: "something, but usually someone [and thus singular] that one cherishes above all others".

It is relevant to use this quotation on this page, but only as an suggestion of how the phrase came into being rather than an example of its use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.99.138.2 (talk) 14:42, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

'בבה is not an apple.'Bold text As an Hebrew speaker, Bava is not an apple, but a pupil. It should have been "the pupil of the eye" and not "the apple of the eye".Noavic (talk) 06:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, this whole section seems in error. First, the citation should not be of Zechariah 2:8, but 2:12 where בַבַת–עֵינוֹ occurs. Also, the discussion of the meaning of אִישׁוֹן flies in the face of Brown, Driver, Briggs (BDB) and HALOT lexicons, both of which attribute the term's origins to a diminutive from אִישׁ, with cognates listed from Arabic. BOTH of these Hebrew uses seem drawn from the same ultimate idea: the reflection of a human being in the eye looks like a small person, a child or baby. Indeed, the use of אישן at Psalm 17:8 even glosses the term in the Masoretic Hebrew test: כְּאִשׁוֹן בַּת–עָיִן "like a pupil, daughter of [the] eye." There are uses of the word, such as at Proverbs 7:9 and 20:20, where the inability of eyes to see in darkness is emphasized, but more than the likely the usage there is a transferred epithet from the word for pupil. In his etymological dictionary, Isidore of Seville (AD 560-636, Etymologiae V.xxxi.1)included in his gloss on the Latin word nox or "night" the folk etymology that it derived from the verb nocere "to harm" because "night harms the eyes," making it impossible to see. This erroneous idea probably stems from the same transference as the Proverbs passages. 2600:1700:59EB:AA00:E452:4548:A4D6:18DC (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Apple of one's eye (Old English), symbol of what is most cherished, was the pupil, supposed to be a globular solid body (source:etymonline.com) Also, earlier English translations of the Bible included the phrase, as it was the Tyndale Bible which was trying to use common phrases to be easy to understand, and the KJV was trying to be a conservative translation, sticking with tradition. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgSDd6Bkatg) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.105.30 (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Merge discussion

Clearly Apple of one's eye covers the same subject matter as this article and should be merged into it. – ukexpat (talk) 12:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup

This article is a mess. AmericanLeMans (talk) 18:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality good??

How can this be good quality? It's a true mess. The article gives no sense of the use of apple as a term for pupil, yet this is the whole crux. This is not original research, it is a simple matter of looking it up in the OED. Apple as a term for the pupil begins in old english, and it continues to occur as a reference that readers will understand through the 19th century; it not until the 20th cent. that it is clearly a historical term. "Apple" thus PREDATES the word "pupil", which has one questionable 15th century example, but otherwise dates from late 16th cent.

From the title, the article seems to want to claim that "apple of my eye" is an idiom, meaning "something precious to me"; but since apple is the original word in English for pupil, the original meaning of the phrase is simply that the pupil is the most valuable part of the eye; if this is a metaphor, it goes back to Deuteronomy, and is used throughout the Old Testament. Everyone else, in Latin, English, French, German, or whatever, is just borrowing this biblical sense.

What is the point of even putting this sort of etymological stuff in an encyclopedia? Another article written to win a bar room bet. Rgr09 (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apple of my eye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121129053917/http://www.idiomsite.com:80/appleofmy.htm to http://www.idiomsite.com/appleofmy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Apple of my eye

So what does it simply mean. I need to know 2A03:2880:30FF:16:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)