This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Panama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PanamaWikipedia:WikiProject PanamaTemplate:WikiProject PanamaPanama articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Costa Rica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Costa Rica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Costa RicaWikipedia:WikiProject Costa RicaTemplate:WikiProject Costa RicaCosta Rica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nicaragua, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nicaragua on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NicaraguaWikipedia:WikiProject NicaraguaTemplate:WikiProject NicaraguaNicaragua articles
Aphonopelma can be dissected into a + phon + o + pelma. Pelma is routinely used in the genus names of tarantulas to mean 'leg'. A- would be expected to mean 'not, without'. The problem is the phon component, which could come from φωνή, giving an overall meaning like 'without sound-making leg', i.e. 'without stridulating leg', or from φόνος, giving an overall meaning like 'without killing leg'. It seems pretty clear that Pocock (1901) meant the former, but he doesn't actually say this, so the evidence is too indirect in my view to be used in the article. Aphonopelma was a genus "dismembered from Eurypelma". The first such listed by Pocock is Citharacanthus which is described as having "a system of stout plumose stridulating-bristles upon the trochanter of the palp and first leg", whereas Aphonopelma has "no plumose scopula on posterior side of trochanter of palp, merely simple hairs, and no spines or spiniform setae on the posterior side of the coxa of the palp", i.e. no apparatus that would enable it to stridulate. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pocock (1901), "Some new and old genera of S.-American Avicularidae", Annals and Magazine of Natural History Series 7, 8 (48): 540–555, doi:10.1080/03745480109443359
Removing the re-direct from Dugesiella to Aphonopelma[edit]
According to the WSC, Dugesiella is now a genus, as such a new article should be made, and the overlapping species removed. MaskedLynx (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
