This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
What an absolute mess: citing sources that do not support the written data; citing controversial reports from biased organizations using a primary source; and linking criticism of Israel to antisemitism; to name a few issues. Makeandtoss (talk) 16:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Makeandtoss and Eladkarmel: Which of the sources in this article do not support the data in the article? Jarble (talk) 20:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 20% claim which I removed. I haven't had the chance to check the article fully, but the example of how this figure was cited to three non-supporting sources, is very worrying to say the least. Makeandtoss (talk) 12:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. "River to the sea" is not a genocidal slogan. Opposing zionism is not anti-semetism. The Western biasedness in this article is open to see for everyone. SoloKnowHow83 (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
