Talk:Anthony Burns

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

African diaspora Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocky Mount, VA vs. Rocky Mount, NC[edit]

Are we sure David McDaniel was from Rocky Mount, NC? I see a Charles F. Suttle buried in Rocky Mount, VA which is what made me question this. I'll do some more research and see if I can confirm or if an update is needed. -kim. (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cost of Capture[edit]

Reference for cost of capture: http://www.masshist.org/longroad/01slavery/burns.htm Anthony burns was a great man. i am doing a report on him and i have realized how how horrible things where back then and i am happy they are different now.--96.27.150.124 (talk) 01:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why he was hated[edit]

Because he caused demeostrations — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.64.13.117 (talk) 22:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anthony Burns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081108152931/http://eserver.org/thoreau/slavery.html to http://eserver.org/thoreau/slavery.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes need work[edit]

The 50 footnotes could be combined into about 10. Each page doesn't get a new entry. But I'm a little tired to use my time cleaning it up. Today. deisenbe (talk) 20:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I switched the footnotes to the {{sfn}} format. There's no need to continue to repeat the full citation for each page. I also consolidated the former Bibliography and the Further reading sections - and alphabetized the list.

I agree with reverting the edit that provided links for each page number. It adds a lot of unnecessary bulk to the article.

Regarding combining footnotes so that each page doesn't need its own footnote - My vote is Oppose. It would make it unnecessarily harder to find the right page in the source document.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony burns[edit]

J3jejrj 204.111.190.66 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]