Talk:Another Day Another Life

Cleanup

I tagged the article with {{advert}} because it seems highly promotional to me. It was either that or {{peacock}}, and I wasn't sure which one was more applicable. I'll try to remember to work on the article later, but I really don't want to spend hours trying to clean up this mess. In particular, the promotional "this is the best film ever made!" kind of stuff really needs to go. The huge list of festivals also is not encyclopedic, as we generally don't track excessive release information like this for films. The awards look like they're basically copied from the IMDb, which is not all discriminating at all in what they list. I'll try remember to find decent citations for the awards, if such exist. The IMDB is not good enough, as that's user-generated and thus not a reliable source. I also made some copy edits for tone and MOS compliance; in particular, we don't call the United States "USA". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello there, based on my review, I could not find "this is the best film ever made!" statement on this page. Also it looks like the references listed are from the film festival websites and not IMDB. I compared IMDB with the list of festivals from the page but could not figure out similarities. Since the content is limited, I was unable to see any content that seems to have any promotional tone. I have updated United Stated to USA. Based on these findings I am deleting the tags from the page. If u have any suggestions, recommendations on how to improve this page, please guide me so I can contribute towards making wikipedia a better experience. Aterrence (talk) 08:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove cleanup tags without resolving the issue. Primary sources are still used extensively in the article. The tone has not been improved, and it is still highly promotional. And, none of the unreliable sources have been replaced. You seem to be associated with this film in some way; please see WP:COI. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

"High critical acclaim" is subjective. How many of these awards are from notable award groups? There are lots of rinky-dink festivals out there. The film has won a lot of awards, which is great, but fluffy language should be limited and simply listing every award the film has won is probably not doing much to avoid a promotional tone. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

I agree. I'm not sure the quotations are truly relevant to the film's reception, as they're coming from people people who run film festivals – not exactly neutral when the film is at their festival. Of course they're going to say nice things about it. The list of awards does seem indiscriminate, and it may require pruning. If no secondary, independent source cares to report that a film won an award, why should Wikipedia? Leave those kinds of awards to the IMDb to catalog. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

I am sorry to have removed the tags. I did not realize the process. I am not directly associated with the film but know the people behind it who are also new to this. They created this based on how other similar wiki articles were treated hence it seemed like the right thing to do. . But based on your expert inputs I agree that the sources are not reliable and there are rinky-dink festivals that need not be a part of the wikipedia. I also aspire to learn from you all and get better at editing wikipedia articles to maintain and enhance its integrity. Can we delete some festivals? I think Under Critical Reception, the festival list is also not needed. Please advise? Aterrence (talk) 19:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Another Day Another Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131216140144/http://nyfa.tumblr.com/post/2062374791/alum-makes-first-feature to http://nyfa.tumblr.com/post/2062374791/alum-makes-first-feature
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.anthemfilmfestival.com/FeaturedFilms.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140911183937/http://thedailyeye.info/watch-critically-acclaimed-short-films-prime-talkies-pocket-films/ to http://thedailyeye.info/watch-critically-acclaimed-short-films-prime-talkies-pocket-films/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214170534/http://www.celebmirror.com/2012/02/06/another-day-another-life-is-a-remarkably-fast-pace-film-say-judges-at-mix-shorts-2012.html to http://www.celebmirror.com/2012/02/06/another-day-another-life-is-a-remarkably-fast-pace-film-say-judges-at-mix-shorts-2012.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130408054859/http://goldendoorfilmfestival.org/archives/4372 to http://goldendoorfilmfestival.org/archives/4372

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)