Talk:Anglican Catholic Church

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anglican Catholic Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515133428/http://www.anglicancatholic.org/main/who/stlouis.html to http://www.anglicancatholic.org/main/who/stlouis.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church naming conventions RfC[edit]

There is currently an RfC at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(Catholic_Church)#RfC:_should_this_page_be_made_a_naming_convention that may be of interest. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 23:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diocese of the Holy Cross[edit]

Should DHC be added to this page, under Original Province? A link to the existing DHC wiki page can be maintained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SAWassen (talk • contribs) 14:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Major update[edit]

I have completed a major overhaul of the page. Removing the parts that were out of date and no longer correct (such as Second Province), and expanding the information and creating all new sections.

The Diocese of the Holy Cross has been included, with internal links to its own Wiki page.

The "Deceased" section under Leadership is not comprehensive. SAWassen (talk) 19:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)SAWassen[reply]

Reassessment for Wikiproject Christianity[edit]

I have reassessed this article for Wikiproject Christianity as C low. The research and attention to detail on this article is excellent, but what keeps it from B class in my view is that it is not sufficiently attentive to the needs and interests of the general reader. It starts strong, but the descent into acronyms feels sudden and disorienting, and the comprehensive list of bishops (active and retired!) feels unnecessary for this sort of article. Meanwhile, other things that may be of more interest to a general reader---questions of theology and social involvement, for example---are entirely absent. Kudos to SAWassen and others for the strong development. Brian (talk) 00:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]