Talk:Angel Mounds

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indiana Historical Society Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indiana Historical Society, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indiana Historical Society-related articles and topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indiana Historical SocietyWikipedia:GLAM/Indiana Historical SocietyTemplate:WikiProject Indiana Historical SocietyIndiana Historical Society articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mounds[edit]

"Mounds" seem plural to me, but in the own Chapter "Mounds" there is only information about "Mound A" (or Central Mound). Is there something missing? When there is a Mound A, it should also exist a "Mound B", ... please forgive me my bad english -- Hartmann Schedel ^Prost 18:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

there are between 10 and 15 mounds at site, it is just that n o one has written about them here yet.He iro 18:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wonderful and thank you for the quick response. Ok nobody wrote something but it is maybe a good idea, just mention this 10-15 Mounds in the Article? btw: the Reference 4 is a very obscure thing with all this blacked text - wat is so secret on this? -- Hartmann Schedel ^Prost 18:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure myself or someone else will get around to it eventually, although I personally don't have time to now. As for the redacted Pdf, it seems it is probably based on an old govt document from the National Park Service, from before it was a park open to the public. At that time they may have not wanted the general public to know its exact location, as to keep looters from sneaking in and illegally digging on the site and selling the artifacts on the black market. All of the redacted parts seem to areas describing its exact location and address. He iro 00:53, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you again for the response - yes this sounds like an understandable reason for black that things out. Good Night for now -- Hartmann Schedel ^cheers 01:09, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources say there were 11 mounds; others say there are 13, so I added descriptions of the three largest mounds, but there needs to be more detail, at least in a summary, about the others.Rosalina523 (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angel Mounds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090607014319/http://tps.cr.nps.gov:80/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=52&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=52&ResourceType=Site

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]