Talk:Anderton, Lancashire

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Help required[edit]

Need some help with the article, --PL.-Snr (talk) 04:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need to concentrate on the village, have a look at Tarleton village. This page has a good lay out and section headings. Maybe try to add some to this page too, maybe make a page just for the manor house with its history and content and try to concentrate this page on the village may be a good start, I will check back once you have made some edits Bankhallbretherton (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Been watching the article still and wow! it has come on alot! looking much better! i think the main pic needs to be changed to soemthing more interesting though... maybe an assest the village has may be best? like a main feature building or open space? A few chickens on some grass doesnt do it any justice, although i do like the pic... I may take a trip out there and take a pic myself if no one else does haha! Bankhallbretherton (talk) 11:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and the main pic should be moved down to the "religious sites" topic would fit in much better Bankhallbretherton (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article isn't even written in modern English. It is difficult to follow and some isn't even in sentences. --92.40.80.141 (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And thats why wikipedia allows you to create an account and edit to improve articles. --PL.-Snr (talk) 04:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't move the labels until it's written in English thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.51.109 (talk) 17:19, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help the article by going in and editing? More heads are better than one or two, your input in edits I am sure will be helpful. I think the listed buildings need to be converted to a list what is your opinion?

--PL.-Snr (talk) 22:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well someone removed it again but didn't read it. My daughter can't understand this, The Penwortham fee included Anderton, which was together with Brindle was granted to the Gresle, Baron of Manchester in 1212 held by Robert Gresle. and I can't help her. We looked here for help with where some family came from but it's in a sort of English we don't understand we'll look somewhere else. What is my opinion? If it can't be understood by an intelligent eleven year old why bother? Why don't you write in language anybody can understand. I now know why wikipedia can be edited by anybody. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.23.126 (talk) 11:53, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chart[edit]

Could someone help to get this to work on here for the creation of a list with details of the 12 buildings.

<no wiki>{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width:100%;border:0px;text-align:left;line-height:150%;" <no wiki>|- <no wiki>! Name |Name and location <no wiki>! class="unsortable"|Photograph <no wiki>! Grade <no wiki>! Date <no wiki>! class="unsortable"|Notes <no wiki>|- <no wiki>|name
0°N 0°E / 0°N -0°E / 0; -0 (name) <no wiki>|[[File:|100px]] <no wiki>! style="background-color: #ACE1AF"|II <no wiki>|align="center"|1. 0000
2. 0000 (rebuilt)
3. (restoration) <no wiki>|-

This has been done - in the form of a separate list: see Listed buildings in Anderton, Lancashire. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anderton, Lancashire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anderton, Lancashire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111011131620/http://www.eurogarages.com/rivington-services/ to http://www.eurogarages.com/rivington-services/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]