Talk:American League Central

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The trivia section about this being the weakest division seems more opinion than fact. The division has produced 3 pennant winners to the AL West's 1 since the inception of the 3 division format in 1994.

Under the "AL Central champions by year" banner, it previously said that the White Sox defeated the Cardinals in the '05 World Series, I correctly changed it to the Astros.

The Trivia section sounds like it was written by either ESPN or a bitter Redsox fan. Get rid of it.

Wild card section[edit]

This sections neutrality is horribly non-exsistent. "The yankee and red sox dominance in the east" is the first glaring example. Yes, both clubs are good, but neither has been 'dominant' in quite a while. "as well as the Central being the weakest division" is not only biased, but one could make the argument that it is in fact the strongest, with at least 3 good teams a year deserving of a playoff spot (detroit, chisox, twins). IMO, the entire commentary in the section should be removed, since it adds nothing of value to the article.