Talk:Alternative data

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Classification[edit]

Referencing alternative data as "non-financial information" is incorrect. It might be data that is not derived from traditional financial institutions, but it is financial data nonetheless. For instance, utility payments, telecommunications bill payments and rent are all financial transactions.Vaheterdu (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alternative data. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at Surveillance capitalism, where I made a comment similar to this one. Is that the same thing, from a different ideological viewpoint? Both articles are orphans. Merge? This content seems useful but misplaced. Merging into Big data would make sense, but that article is already too crowded. This belongs somewhere in the finance space, but where? John Nagle (talk) 19:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Big data didn't have a finance section, so I added a brief one, linking to here, surveillance capitalism, and technical analysis. John Nagle (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]