Talk:Alleycat Rock: Female Boss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plot is wrong[edit]

The "Synopsis" section of this article with the plot was copied from allmovie.com but it is completely wrong. Would someone like to improve it? JoshuSasori (talk) 01:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway I have just removed that section since it was nonsense. JoshuSasori (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Film's name[edit]

Of the names at the top of the article,

Alleycat Rock: Female Boss (女番長野良猫ロック Onna banchō nora-neko rokku?) aka Stray Cat Rock: Delinquent Girl Boss, Female Juvenile Delinquent Leader: Alleycat Rock, Wildcat Rock

the only one with a citation is "Wildcat Rock". Alleycat Rock:Female Boss appears on the internet only in duplicates of Wikipedia. Can anyone provide any evidence for what this film was called in English? JoshuSasori (talk) 10:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critical appraisal[edit]

The critical appraisal section has a whole lot of stuff from a book about "sex movies" but this film isn't a sex movie. As noted in the section above, the plot from "Allmovie" is completely wrong so that critical appraisal can hardly be trusted. I suggest removing the "Critical appraisal" section completely unless some more reliable sources can be found. If anyone objects, could they respond here? Thanks. JoshuSasori (talk) 01:17, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sex manual looks unreliable. I recommend deleting it. "Allmovie" appears to base its review on the unreliable sex manual, so it is doubly unreliable. Horace Higginbotham (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a sex manual. JoshuSasori (talk) 01:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. Horace Higginbotham (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Horace Higginbotham, you seem to only use the account to reply to queries by me, and I don't think you are sincere. JoshuSasori (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is true I am not interested in kungfu movies like this one. I responded here only because you asked me to on my page. It seemed obvious to me that a sex book should not be quoted at this article, so I made my statement. It seems strange that I am now accused of stalking your edits, but I can take a hint. Good day. Horace Higginbotham (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]