Talk:Agostino Tassi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

A disaster. I don't know who wrote this article, but he or she hasn't done serious research.

I wrote much of this article. The sources I utilized are included on this page. None of this material is made up, but has been culled from available resources. Could you please be more specific about what requires improvement/modification? I'd be happy to make any necessary changes. --Polylerus 00:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The sources must have been subsequently removed. There is currently only a link to a list of Tassi's works. I've added an 'unreferenced' clean-up template. Sionk (talk) 00:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Agostino Tassi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Annulled verdict?[edit]

The article makes the statement that Agostino Tassi's conviction for rape was annulled. If that were the case, then wouldn't his conviction have never legally existed? In other words, any part of the article that states he was a convicted rapist is false. 47.217.107.180 (talk) 04:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incest[edit]

> Tassi [. . .] had committed incest with his sister-in-law

Not to defend this guy, who is, objectively, a piece of shit, but the sibling-in-law relationship is nearly always between people who are not blood relatives, and therefore sex between them would not constitute incest. Was Tassi's siter-in-law also his sister? (Then why not say so?) Also, there's no citation for this statement. TypoBoy (talk) 15:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's been more than a month, and nobody has supported the incest charge. I removed it from the article TypoBoy (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]